Relief Bill Battle

Relief Bill Battle 

 

See the source image

Corruption on Boths in Congress: They are not working for the people

This video got both accounts removed and these two anons fought hard to get this message out!  It’s saved on YouTube.

 

Lawmakers on Both Sides Block Changes to CCP Virus Bill

Lawmakers on Both Sides Block Changes to CCP Virus Bill

December 24, 2020 Updated: December 24, 2020

There were multiple attempts on Thursday from both Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives to amend the pandemic aid and government spending package, after President Donald Trump’s surprise demand for more stimulus money for U.S. citizens.

One of Trump’s requests was to increase direct payments to Americans from $600 to $2,000 per person, which Democrats attempted to approve on Thursday. Republicans who opposed the higher amount blocked that effort.

Republicans then moved to change the amount of foreign aid included in the package, but Democrats ended up blocking that request as well. Trump, in his announcement, had objected to the millions in foreign aid. The House then adjourned for the day.

It comes after House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) wrote to his colleagues on Wednesday night that Republicans would offer a unanimous consent request to “reexamine how our tax dollars are spent overseas while so many of our neighbors at home are struggling to make ends meet.”

“House Democrats appear to be suffering from selective hearing. They have conveniently ignored the concerns expressed by the president, and shared by our constituents … It will be up to Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi to decide if she wants to act on behalf of the American people,” McCarthy wrote.

The activity on Thursday did nothing to change the status of the $2.3 trillion omnibus spending bill, which is now in limbo.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the chamber will hold a recorded vote on the stimulus check increase next Monday.

McCarthy and Pelosi’s office did not respond to requests for comment after the House adjourned on Thursday.

Trump didn’t use the word “veto” in his earlier statement, but all but implied he would block the bill unless Congress removed billions in spending allocated to foreign nations and domestic institutions unrelated to the battle against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus.

Top Democrats quickly took up Trump’s offer. Pelosi has urged Republicans to pass a standalone measure for the $2,000 payments in a unanimous consent vote on Christmas Eve. She made no mention of the foreign spending that Trump criticized, including $10 million for gender programs in Pakistan. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) urged the president to convince Republicans to approve the measure.

The timing of the bill’s passage gives Trump the option of letting the bill fail without issuing an actual veto. The Constitution provides for a so-called pocket veto in the event that Congress adjourns during the 10 days following the passage of a bill. With Sundays excluded and Congress set to adjourn on Jan. 3, Trump has the option of letting the bill terminate without setting pen to paper.

Ivan Pentchoukov and Reuters contributed to this report.

Follow Bowen on Twitter: @BowenXiao_

Final Battle

Final Battle 

SteveBannon #elections #China

‘This Is The Only Fight That Matters’—Steve Bannon on the 2020 Elections and China’s Infiltration

We have to Fight for Freedom

 

We have to fight for freedom 

See the source image

Flynn: Foreign Intelligence Agencies Were Monitoring US Election, Willing to Provide Information to Trump

December 20, 2020 Updated: December 20, 2020

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn said he was provided information that foreign intelligence agencies were monitoring the U.S. election on Nov. 3 and are willing to provide evidence to President Donald Trump.      See the source image

“We have evidence now of foreign countries … were watching the attacks on our election system, our election process, on the 3rd of November,” Flynn told Fox Business on Friday. “So we now have that evidence and we received that today,” he said.

He didn’t elaborate on what foreign intelligence agencies were involved, how he obtained that information, or the nature of the alleged attacks on the election system.

But the foreign governments “are willing to provide that directly to the president,” Flynn remarked. “There are foreign partners and allies that are willing to help us,” he said.

The Epoch Times reached out to Flynn, the White House, and the Trump campaign for comment.

Flynn had been making reference to the SolarWinds cyberattack that impacted a considerable portion of federal government agencies. It is not clear if Flynn’s previous remarks about foreign countries monitoring the Nov. 3 election was linked to the SolarWinds hack.

“I would say is SolarWinds is an entry point into the rest of our entire U.S. critical infrastructure,” Flynn added. “So everything that touches the United States government, if you enter through this SolarWinds attack that we perceive you basically have keys to the vault.”

Earlier in the week, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) cybersecurity agency warned that the hack presents a risk to the Federal Government and state, local, tribal, and territorial governments as well as critical infrastructure entities” as well as the private sector.”

These hackers compromised agencies, critical infrastructure programs, and private sector organizations starting in March 2020 or possibly before that, according to the agency.

“You’re able to rummage around and do [expletive] near anything. So it’s a very, very serious attack … We’ve known about it for about six months as I understand it,” Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, added to Fox’s Lou Dobbs. “So when we talk about our election security, Lou, I think this is all part of it because there’s a relationship between these SolarWinds attacks which has basically penetrated our entire infrastructure as well as our election securities.”

Flynn noted that there is “evidence of foreign influence in the election and this too,” adding that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), North Korea, Iran, and Russia are involved.

But Flynn said that “we are in an information war,” the main perpetrator “is China,” and the CCP are “masters at it.”

“We’re in a very, very dangerous period right now for our country,” he said.

See the source image

 

Georgia Senators: Coordinated Illegal Actions Appear to Have Taken Place During Election

December 21, 2020 Updated: December 21, 2020

A recently released report from Georgia senators studying the Nov. 3 election found evidence of illegal activity carried out by workers at State Farm Arena.

“The events at the State Farm Arena are particularly disturbing because they demonstrated intent on the part of election workers to exclude the public from viewing the counting of ballots, an intentional disregard for the law. The number of votes that could have been counted in that length of time was sufficient to change the results of the presidential election and the senatorial contests,” the report from the state Senate’s Election Law Study Subcommittee reads.

“Furthermore, there appears to be coordinated illegal activities by election workers themselves who purposely placed fraudulent ballots into the final election totals.”

Workers counted mail-in ballots at the arena. According to surveillance footage and witness testimony from Election Day, workers stopped counting ballots around 10:30 p.m. but resumed after observers and media left.

A spokesman for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger didn’t respond to a request for comment. Gabriel Sterling, an official who works out of the office, has acknowledged there was an 82-minute period that night when no monitor was present, but the office blamed media and observers for leaving after the announcement that counting was stopping for the night.

The Georgia Election Law Study Subcommittee is part of the Senate Judiciary Committee. According to Subcommittee Chairman William Ligon, a Republican, the report hasn’t been formally approved by either the subcommittee or the committee.

Requests for comment sent to the five members of the subcommittee weren’t immediately returned.

In the report, legislators note that scores of witnesses and experts testified about irregularities and fraud allegations during a public hearing earlier this month.

In summary, legislators wrote, the general election “was chaotic and any reported results must be viewed as untrustworthy.”

Lawmakers heard evidence about proper chain of custody protocols being violated, about fraudulent ballots likely being introduced into the pool of ballots being counted, about pristine ballots whose origin looked suspicious, and about unsecured ballots.

“A great deal of testimony supported evidence of a coordinated effort to prevent a transparent process of observing the counting of ballots during the absentee ballot opening period and on election night. Witnesses testified to hostility to Republican poll workers during the recount—directional signage was unavailable, doors were locked, and Republican poll watchers were sent home early or given menial assignments,” the report states.

“Monitors throughout the state were often kept at an unreasonably long distance—some social distancing was understandable, but monitors were blocked from having the visual ability to see what was written on the ballots or to have any meaningful way to check the counting or to double-check that what was counted was actually assigned to the right candidate.”

Two of the poll observers who testified were later terminated by Fulton County. Raffensperger has called for them to be rehired; Fulton County hasn’t responded to requests for comment.

Among the recommendations outlined in the report are that unqualified voters should be purged from voter rolls; violations for state law should be be prosecuted; forensic audits of ballots and machines should be carried out; and the state legislature should consider moving to choose the slate of electors.

Ligon led a push to convene a special session of the legislature to consider taking back the power to appoint electors, but that effort didn’t garner the required support. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, can also call a special session, but has thus far refused to do so.

Follow Zachary on Twitter: @zackstieber

Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative

Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative

Is This Real? New Evidence Shows That Total Us Death Toll in 2020 No Different Than Other Years

While the Democrats are still looking to keep everything closed down in the meantime, GOP members who are actually taking a closer look at new Image result for patriot quotes about truthstudies believe that this is not a sound course of action. A recent study from Johns Hopkins University showed that the United States death toll is not much different from recent years.

Additional studies have also surfaced that make similar claims. Of course, the original Johns Hopkins study was taken down as soon as the liberals caught wind of it. The university could not allow the study to stand for even a second. When the study was taken down, they passed the buck to the WHO and the CDC.

This does not make much sense when we already know that the information on hand is nonsense. The WHO and the CDC have been misleading people throughout the duration of the pandemic. Once everyone had the chance to learn about the WHO’s garbage data, they should have been willing to move on.nstead, there are still people out there who are willing to listen to whatever these organizations have to say. The CDC has yet to be fully forthcoming about their data, too. So why should anyone be ready to ignore additional data that has been provided by organizations that are not looking to advance a political agenda?

See the source imageThat’s where we get lost. We would think that Americans would be relieved to learn that the death toll is not as high as they would like to think that it is. This is not what people want, though. It’s like everyone has resigned themselves to living in fear until the vaccines have arrived. COVID-19 reporting has been based in this type of fear from the very beginning.

The Gateway Pundit has also conducted its own study on the matter, which aligns with the findings from the Johns Hopkins study. It is hard to reconcile the figures in the United States and around the world because so many places have their own standards for what constitutes a COVID-19 related death. That doesn’t stop the liberal media from trying to downplay the very real studies from Johns Hopkins and Gateway Pundit.

The only metric that can be trusted going forward is the overall death numbers. These are the only numbers that are unable to be corrupted by the liberal media types. The overall death toll in 2019 was 2.9 million. The overall death toll for 2020, as of November? 2.5 million. Even if you take the holiday death toll into account, it is going to be tough for the numbers to match.

The mainstream media and Big Pharma are not interested in discussing these numbers because they do not align with the narrative that they have chosen. United States medical professionals and the Chinese may want everyone to think that the world is coming to an end but that’s not the case. As it turns out, a lot of the worries about a significantly increased death toll See the source imagewere totally unfounded.

That’s what we have been trying to say all year but the message seems to have fallen on deaf ears. The liberals are currently doing everything in their power to cancel Christmas. The days of people being willing to study and report on the truth have come and gone. It’s all about bending the information to fit whatever narrative has already been established and little more. At the risk of sounding too much like an old episode of X-Files, the truth is still out there.

We just need brave patriots who are willing to find it and report on it, like the good old days. What happened to being ready to report on things, even when they do not align with your chosen worldview? 2020 has been a long year, especially from a reporting standpoint. Americans cannot trust anything that they are being told anymore and yet people have the nerve to wonder why ‘fake news’ claims are at an all-time high.

More lies by the media found at this link

 

See the source image

Big Things About To Happen

Big Things About To Happen

Trump: Supporters Should Join ‘Wild’ Protest in DC on Jan. 6

Trump: Supporters Should Join ‘Wild’ Protest in DC on Jan. 6

December 19, 2020 Updated: December 19, 2020

President Donald Trump on Saturday called on supporters to join in a planned protest in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump alleged in a tweet that it was “statistically impossible” for him to have lost the 2020 election, referring to a report that his trade adviser Peter Navarro released this week.

He then added: “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!”

In another missive, the president said Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden didn’t win the election.

“He lost all 6 Swing States, by a lot. They then dumped hundreds of thousands of votes in each one, and got caught. Now Republican politicians have to fight so that their great victory is not stolen. Don’t be weak fools!” he wrote.

Biden has declared victory in the election, referring to certified vote counts from all 50 states. Trump and other Republicans are contesting election results in courts in key states. The Epoch Times is not calling the race at this time.

Navarro released a report that alleged the election “may well have been stolen” from Trump.

“If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again,” Navarro said in the report.

Trump supporters are expected to gather in the nation’s capitol as members of Congress convene in a joint session on Jan. 6 to count electoral votes. “Stop the Steal” organizers have said they’ll hold an event.

Joe Biden
Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden walks in Wilmington, Del., on Dec. 17, 2020. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

There’s an outside possibility that Congress moves to nullify some state’s votes, or change them from a Democratic slate of electors to a Republican one, but some experts believe that is unlikely.

During the counting, a partnership of at least one representative and at least one senator can file objections in writing to a state’s votes. That triggers the chambers to withdraw and debate the objection. The chambers can then vote on the objection; it requires a simple majority in each chamber to be withheld.

A handful of people who will be in the House of Representatives when Congress meets—Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and Rep.-elects Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Barry Moore (R-Ala.), and Bob Good (R-Va.)—have committed to filing objections. At least five senators or senators-elect have said they aren’t ruling out joining them.

Republican Senate leadership, and many Democrats have derided the plans.

“There is 0.00 chance the House reverses the election,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) wrote on Twitter.

“I think on the basis of the way that the system works, the decision by the Electoral College yesterday was determinative,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters this week, referring to electors casting votes in their respective states.

“The Electoral College submitted its vote. And I also think as we look into next year, it’s very important that each of us pledges to work with President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect [Kamala] Harris,” Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, told reporters.

Follow Zachary on Twitter: @zackstieber
John Adams quote: But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored...

Science of Mask Risks and Spiritual Implications

Science of Mask Risks

While we hope masks offer protection against COVID-19, research finds that may not be true and they may cause other health problems. (FamVeld/Shutterstock)
Masks have become mandatory in many places, despite conflicting research
December 18, 2020 Updated: December 18, 2020

If 2020 could be summed up in a single garment, it would be a mask.

Whether it’s one of those blue pleated surgical models, a snug-fitting N95, or a homemade version with a cheery seasonal print, the mask has become the face of the pandemic. There are several ways doctors say we can protect ourselves from COVID-19, but the loudest and most persistent prescription by far is a mask.

Wearing a mask is supposed to contain a potentially deadly disease. And with no end in sight for the COVID-19 pandemic, health officials want to see more masks on more faces.

Of course, not everyone embraces the idea. Masks are uncomfortable, inconvenient, and some evidence suggests they might be unnecessary. However, in many indoor places, masks are a requirement. And as case numbers continue to climb, many call for a mandate in which everyone must mask up anywhere they go.

The rationale for mask mandates is that responsibility trumps rights. If health officials say masks save lives, then we owe it to everyone to make this sacrifice. In an Aug. 25 blog post titled “Masks Save Lives,” National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins says he masks up whenever he’s outside his home. He points to a “sophisticated mathematical model” funded by NIH and published in Nature Communications to justify the recommendation for everyone.

“Under different outbreak scenarios and mask usages, the researchers calculated the total numbers of expected SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths from COVID-19,” Collins said. “Not surprisingly, they found that the total number of deaths and infections declined as the availability and effectiveness of face masks increased.”

But what if masks actually create more problems than they solve? That’s a question pondered in four peer-reviewed research papers published in the journal Primary Doctor.

In their last installment, researchers concluded that due to the extensive risk to mask wearers documented in these papers, “we urgently recommend that no adult or child be coerced to wear a mask under any circumstances.”

In a world in which people consider a mask a life-or-death issue, such a statement seems dangerous, blasphemous, and anti-science.

But according to co-author of the papers on the problems associated with masks, Dr. Colleen Huber, forcing everyone to mask up doesn’t make sense.

“Respiratory droplets have been really exaggerated recently by those who advocate masks. As if we were spitting all over everything all the time,” Huber said. “It suggests we’ve been lethal to human success of the species. However, for 99.999 percent of our existence on earth, we’ve been a relatively successful species from an evolutionary perspective.”

While Huber’s statement may sound radical in a discussion of mask mandates, many doctors and scientists back her claim.

In October, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a medical professor at Stanford University, told Just the News that mask mandates are “not supported by the scientific data.”

“For instance, there is no randomized evidence to show that mask mandates would work to slow the spread of the disease. In fact, for influenza, the randomized studies that have been done suggest that they don’t work to slow the spread of the disease.”

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is now a staunch supporter of masks as a public health measure, previously saw little use for them. In a CDC policy review on “non-pharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings,” researchers stated that after examining 10 randomized controlled trials, they “found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.”

Huber and her team observed a similar theme in regard to COVID-19. They looked at data from a survey on masks done by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) this summer, and compared it to their own survey with the same 25 countries three months later.

Both surveys asked subjects if they had always worn a mask when they left their homes. In the CFR survey, Singapore had the highest yes responses: 93 percent. The fewest were Finland and Denmark, where only 1 percent answered yes.

“When we looked at the same countries in October, there were actually fewer positive COVID tests in the countries that were the least masked,” Huber said.

The largest and most recent scientific evaluation on the effectiveness of masks also shows no support for the practice.

Danish researchers published their findings in a November issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine. They conducted a randomized controlled study with about 4,800 participants completing the trial. Half the subjects were assigned to wear masks, and the other half went without. Both groups were instructed to maintain other public health measures—social distancing and clean hands.

COVID-19 infections occurred in 42 participants who wore masks (1.8 percent) and in 53 of the maskless control participants (2.1 percent), resulting in a “statistically insignificant” difference of 0.3 of a percentage point.

The study didn’t assess whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.

Stopping the Spread?

It seems hard to believe now, but when the COVID-19 pandemic first hit, health officials actually discouraged people from wearing masks. On March 30, a United Nations tweet, citing experts from the World Health Organization (WHO), stated that “there is no evidence that wearing a mask by healthy people has any medical benefit.”

Today, masks must now be worn everybody, whether you feel sick or not.

The policy changed when health officials discovered that asymptomatic carriers, people actively infected with COVID-19 but showing no symptoms, were inadvertently spreading the disease through the process of normal respiration.

How much this asymptomatic influence has on the spread of COVID-19 is unclear. Statements from the WHO say this type of transmission is “rare,” but the degree to which it occurs is unknown. One study from September estimates the proportion of asymptomatic infections from 18 to 81 percent. Researchers could provide no guidance for how the data should influence public health measures.

However, health officials remain firm that masks are a must for perhaps years to come. Even with a vaccine, health experts say we must remain diligent in containing our droplets.

In October, Dr. Anthony Fauci, infectious disease expert and head of the U.S. COVID-19 task force, forecast that mask-wearing and social distancing may remain in our world well into 2022.

“It’s not going to be the way it was with polio and measles, where you get a vaccine, case closed, it’s done,” Fauci told the Philadelphia Inquirer. “It’s going to be public health measures that linger for months and months.”

The mathematical model used to support mask mandates primarily focuses on medical-grade, surgical masks. But anything that covers your mouth and nose will get you in a store without a hassle.

However, a study from Duke University suggests that some masks may spread droplets more than no mask at all. The study explored how different masks filtered droplets during speech. Researchers noticed that “speaking through some masks (particularly the neck gaiter) seemed to disperse the largest droplets into a multitude of smaller droplets, which explains the apparent increase in droplet count relative to no mask in that case. Considering that smaller particles are airborne longer than large droplets (larger droplets sink faster), the use of such a mask might be counterproductive.”

Another issue was noted with N95 masks that feature an exhalation valve. Researchers said the valve doesn’t compromise the protection of the wearer, but it “can decrease the protection of persons surrounding the wearer.”

The Duke University study also found that bandanas and knitted masks also performed poorly, but none of these findings have done anything to change health policy.

Huber says there’s a concerted effort to censor any negative information about masks, even if the details might be important to public health.

“Those blue masks available at the grocery store, they’re sterilized with ethylene oxide, which is a known carcinogen. And they are made with PFOA in their fibers which is a known lung cancer risk,” Huber said. “I retweeted this on Twitter and I was kicked off for seven days.”

Before this report went to print, Huber was removed from Twitter permanently.

Weighing the Risks

Throughout the pandemic, YouTube and social media have routinely silenced voices that stray from official statements and policy pertaining to COVID-19, or attached warning labels to give context to rogue commentary.

The goal is to protect public health. In a statement about “immunizing the public against misinformation,”the WHO stated that bad information can have “social and lethal health ramifications in the context of a global pandemic.”

“We’re not just battling the virus,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “We’re also battling the trolls and conspiracy theorists that push misinformation and undermine the outbreak response.”

For example, if masks truly save lives, then any information that might discourage the public from wearing one could prove deadly.

However, if there are health problems associated with masks, shouldn’t this also inform policy?

In Huber’s studies, and in several she cited, masks compromise oxygen intake. They may be made of thin cloth, but a physical barrier is still covering your airways, and breathing is clearly better without one.

“There is no successful species that has any obstruction to their breathing,” Huber said. “No species has evolved a mask, chosen to wear one, or sought out a mask in nature. It’s only humans and this has been very rare throughout our history, for free people anyway. Masks have been used historically in slavery, and in torture at Guantanamo.”

Of course, surgeons regularly wear masks for hours on end, so we should theoretically have little problem with one when we go about our business. However, there is evidence that even medical personnel can have issues.

“We found a study where surgeons also suffered from deoxygenation,” Huber said.

That 2008 study “revealed a decrease in the oxygen saturation of arterial pulsations (SpO2) and a slight increase in pulse rates compared to preoperative values in all surgeon groups. The decrease was more prominent in the surgeons aged over 35.”

Since 1979, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has determined that the optimal range of oxygen in the air for humans is 19.5 percent or more. Anything less has been labeled as “not safe for workers.”

When Huber and her team measured the airspace inside a mask with an OSHA-approved oxygen meter, it measured 17.4 percent within 10 seconds, and stayed below that threshold.

Children under 2 years of age are exempt from mask regulations, but Huber and her colleagues believe older children should also be exempt. They note that oxygen deficiency is even more of an emergency for younger people than it is for adults. They point to anatomical differences in children’s bodies that make them more vulnerable to “injury from hypoxic assault.”

Another issue with mask-wearing is particulates. Huber and her team looked at brand-new masks of the models most frequently worn, and at 40 times magnification found lots of debris and loose fibers all over the face-side surface. The most debris was found on cloth masks that had been laundered once.

Inhaling a few particulates may seem fairly harmless. But Huber found numerous air-quality issues that exist inside a mask compared to barrier-free breathing. And over time, these issues could lead to serious illness.

“If you inhale particulates, then you put yourself at risk for lung diseases,” Huber said. “One of the worst diseases that we mention that is a risk is pulmonary fibrosis. It’s a very threatening disease because there is no cure for it in conventional or natural medicine. Pulmonary fibrosis is slow suffocation of a patient. The survival rate at five years is only 20 percent.”

Because a mask deprives you of oxygen, you have to breathe more forcefully to get the air you need, which results in more suction, drawing in debris.

Our bodies are designed to cough out most particulates we might happen to inhale, thanks to little hair-like structures in our upper airways called cilia that help us expectorate. However, because a mask makes it harder to expel carbon dioxide, Huber says it can make cilia immobile, and keep particles stuck deep in our airways.

It’s clear that good breathing is essential to good health. We inhale life-giving oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide waste with every breath. But Huber says that for all types of masks, the carbon dioxide in the masked airspace exceeded the OSHA requirement for room air in about 30 seconds, and continued to increase the longer it is worn.

“People might say, ‘Carbon dioxide molecules are so tiny, even tinier than a virus that it can easily escape through the mesh of a mask,’” Huber said. “This isn’t true. While it only takes a microscopic amount of viral particles to infect, we breathe in about a half liter to a liter of carbon dioxide with every single breath. … That’s a lot of carbon dioxide.”

Wearing a mask can also create a buildup of bacteria, and many doctors are now seeing health problems related to it. At an August press conference for a lawsuit to stop Oklahoma City’s mask mandate on the grounds that it’s “harmful to healthy people,” Dr. James Meehan reported seeing patients with facial rashes, fungal infections, and bacterial infections due to their masks.

“Reports from my colleagues coming from all over the world are suggesting that bacterial pneumonia is on the rise,” Meehan said. “Why might that be? Because untrained members of the public are wearing medical masks repeatedly in an unsterile fashion.”

Meehan estimates having worn a medical mask in surgical procedures more than 10,000 times, but he says even those who wear masks properly in an operating room, an environment designed for people to wear masks in for prolonged periods of time, suffer health problems from wearing them.

“I’ll start to develop a tremor after 30 minutes of mask wear in that high air-exchange, higher oxygen level, cool environment [of the operating room]. Imagine what untrained members of our community are doing when they are wearing them in the Oklahoma summer.” he said. “Masks can block oxygen intake significantly. That’s been demonstrated in experiments all over the world. It’s been studied in surgeons in an optimal environment where there is a higher level of oxygen in an operating suite.”

As case levels rise, and officials struggle to get a pandemic under control, many look to mask mandates as part of the solution. But should a cost-benefit analysis of a mass medical intervention also be included in the conversation? Huber believes so. She says that understanding the harms is especially urgent for children, employees, and others compelled to wear a mask for extended periods of time.

“People think, ‘Well, it’s just a piece of cloth. I’m just going to wear it for a few minutes while I go to the grocery store. What’s the big deal if it protects Grandma?”’ Huber said. “But at what point does the illness that results from this going to be regrettable?”  END

Follow Conan on Twitter: @ConanMilner 

MANDATORY MASKS AS A RITUAL?
Perhaps the  mask is more of a global ritual under the  disguise of a health pandemic.  We have all heard of the Great Reset.  This is a battle of Good and Evil. For ceremonies  where masks are worn, they are viewed by both spectators and participants as consecrated objects imbued with supernatural power. Let’s examine the four distinct, but interrelated, occult rituals that make up this massive global occult ritual initiation ceremony today: Ritual Mask-Wearing, Ritual Hand-Washing, Ritual “Social Distancing” and Ritual Lockdowns. Among other things, the wearing of the mask over one’s mouth is a token of submission, a gesture of your willingness to be subject to others who are not your usual Sovereign.

When persons being held as slaves were accused by their masters of insubordination, or of eating more than their allotment of food, they might expect to be fitted with an iron muzzle. In his autobiography, Olaudah Equiano described his first encounter with such a device in the mid-1700s. . .

“I had seen a black woman slave as I came through the house, who was cooking the dinner, and the poor creature was cruelly loaded with various kinds of iron machines; she had one particularly on her head, which locked her mouth so fast that she could scarcely speak, and could not eat or drink. I [was] much astonished and shocked at this contrivance, which I afterwards learned was called the iron muzzle.”

Slave with Iron Muzzle is an illustration from the 1839 publication, Souvenirs d’un aveugle, by Jacques Etienne Victor Arago  (link).

Perhaps it is time to consider  the wearing of a mask may represent an occult transformation, a human alchemy, if you will , from one role to another.  From one manner of being, to another.  In this case, from individual sovereign under God to collective subject under the children of the devil,  a positive to negative transformation. The masking ritual is specifically designed to reverse the order of hierarchy  of Infinite Intelligence.  In the hierarchy of God, you are a sovereign representative of the divine.  Psychologically, as a spectator, you  are linked to the past through the spirit power of the mask.  So ask yourself , does your mask  represent malignant, evil, negative or potentially harmful spirits?

Using our God Given Gift of Discernment can assist you in answering those questions.

Senate Was the Target

Senate Was the Target 

From Epoch Times: Did you know that our documentary on the irregularities of the 2020 election. Who’s Stealing America? was produced in only 40 days? We  started investigating after allegations of voter fraud and irregularities began to emerge on the night of the election. And what we found alarmed us. We knew right away that the results of our research had implications for the outcome of the 2020 election.

Excellent video that Everyone should watch!!!!! Who’s Stealing America? 

Gospel of Thomas (5) Jesus said: Recognize what is before you, and what is hidden from you will be revealed to you; for there is nothing hidden that will not be made manifest.

Mark 4:21-23  And he said unto them, Is a candle brought to be put under a bushel, or under a bed? and not to be set on a candlestick? For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was any thing kept secret, but that it should come abroad. If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.

The Great Reset Davos & the Plot to Cancel Trump

The Great Reset Davos & the Plot to Cancel Trump

%d