Russiagate investigator believes Durham cracked ‘insurance policy’ mystery

Russiagate investigator believes Durham cracked ‘insurance policy’ mystery

Kash Patel, a former top House Intelligence Committee aide, said he believes special counsel John Durham has figured out the “insurance policy” discussed by leading FBI officials in the heat of the 2016 presidential election.

A text message sent by FBI agent Peter Strzok to then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page in August 2016 mentioning an “insurance policy” is integral to what Republican investigators have long suspected to be part of a so-called plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump — a view rejected by ex-top FBI brass involved in the matter. Strzok and Page, who were romantically linked, have filed separate lawsuits against the Justice Department and the FBI for alleged wrongful firing under political pressure and violating the Privacy Act with the release of their text messages, respectively.

One week into the trial of Michael Sussmann, a former lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign accused of lying to the FBI, Patel said the “damning testimony” heard by the court so far will inevitably have former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, as well as “lovebirds” Strzok and Page, “concocting an ‘insurance plan.'”

“And I think John Durham knows what that ‘insurance plan’ is. I know we figured it out during Russiagate, and we have tried to educate the American public on it, but it remains classified, partly,” Patel told Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo on her Fox News program Sunday Morning Futures.

Text messages between Strzok and Page, in which they displayed a negative opinion of former President Trump, were uncovered over the course of the Justice Department inspector general’s investigation into the DOJ and FBI’s conduct during the investigation into Clinton’s unauthorized private email server, which she used while secretary of state.

SUSSMANN TOLD CIA SIMILAR ‘CLIENT’ LIE IN 2017, DURHAM SAYS

The text Strzok sent to Page on Aug. 15, 2016, weeks before Clinton lost to Trump in the presidential contest, read, “I want to believe the path you threw out in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take the risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

Both Strzok and Page were later grilled about their messages during testimony to congressional investigators.

Strzok recalled the mid-August 2016 text mentioning an “insurance plan” as being part of a larger conversation about protecting an “extremely sensitive source” as he and Page considered how far to lean into the counterintelligence investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia, as it was widely viewed that Trump did not have a very good chance of beating Clinton in the election. Page acknowledged the texts were referring to the Russia investigation but said it was a “continuing check-in” to decide how quickly to proceed with the investigation based on the outcome of the election.

Durham began his review of the origins and conduct of the Russia investigation as a U.S. attorney following an appointment by former Attorney General William Barr in 2019. Although Durham left his role as U.S. attorney, the Biden administration let the inquiry continue after Barr appointed him special counsel. The endeavor has long been criticized by Democrats and some legal observers, who claim the inquiry is meant to undercut special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into ties between the Trump 2016 campaign and Russia. Trump and his allies have championed it as a means to rid agencies such as the FBI of corrupt officials and uncover the role Clinton played in ginning up Trump-Russia collusion concerns, including in the media sphere.

Special counsel John Durham is seen.
Special counsel John Durham is seen. (Graeme Jennings / Washington Examiner)

Durham has two active prosecutions. One of them is a case against Sussmann, who was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI about whom he was representing when, in September 2016, he presented internet data that suggested a now-discredited link between Trump and a Russian bank. Sussmann denies lying to the FBI and has pleaded not guilty. His trial continues next week.

STRZOK PUSHED FALSEHOOD ON TRUMP-RUSSIA INQUIRY ORIGIN IN 2017, NOTES INDICATE

The other prosecution centers on a case against a key source for British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier. In addition, Durham has obtained a single guilty plea, which came from former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who admitted to altering an email about a onetime Trump campaign aide, Carter Page, under government surveillance. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation was filled with serious missteps and errors and concealed potentially exculpatory information from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Justice Department told the FISA court it believed at least the final two of four FISA warrants were “not valid.”

McCabe testified to Congress in 2020 that he was “shocked and disappointed” by the “errors and mistakes” found in the FISA applications and expressed regret about signing off on one of the renewals. However, he also denied that the FBI’s Trump-Russia inquiry was meant to be a “coup,” stressing, “We had many reasons at that point to believe the president himself might pose a danger to national security.”

McCabe, who was fired from the FBI in 2018 hours before his retirement, said in 2019 he was the one who ordered an obstruction of justice inquiry into Trump after the firing of FBI Director James Comey to ensure the Russia investigation would not “vanish in the night without a trace.” Also in 2019, McCabe filed a wrongful termination lawsuit and last year won back his full pension as part of a settlement with the Justice Department. Briefing notes disclosed during Sussmann’s trial show McCabe talked about Trump’s “tweet activity” in March 2017 after Trump accused former President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Patel, who held high-ranking positions in the Trump administration after departing the House intelligence panel, emphasized on Sunday that the timing of the “insurance policy” text is important to consider. “I remind the audience that’s in August of 2016, when they were digesting the Steele dossier, when they were running with the Alfa-Bank server nonsense, and when they were getting ready to go to the FISA court,” he said. “This trio, who led this, the biggest criminal conspiracy in U.S. history, I believe is in the crosshairs of John Durham.”

Patel also predicted there will be more charges in Durham’s long-running investigation. “I firmly believe he’s got a few more indictments coming this summer,” he said.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/russiagate-investigator-believes-durham-cracked-insurance-policy-mystery

Treasonous Traitors Among Us; The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions

White House, Hillary Clinton Decline to Comment on Durham Allegations

By Katabella Roberts
February 16, 2022 Updated: February 16, 2022

White House spokesperson on Monday declined to comment on Special counsel John Durham’s allegations that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) spied on former President Donald Trump’s residences and the White House when he was in office in order to bring a “narrative” to federal government agencies linking him to Russia.

Deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked three times at a press briefing by Fox News correspondent Jacqui Heinrich to answer questions regarding the allegations.

But each time, the White House spokesperson referred her to the Department of Justice.

“Does the President have any concerns about a candidate for president using computer experts to infiltrate computer systems of competing candidates, or even the president-elect to—for the goal of creating a narrative?” Heinrich asked.

“That’s something I can’t speak to from this podium, so I refer you to the Department of Justice,” Jean-Pierre initially answered.

“Is what’s being described in that report—monitoring internet traffic—is that spying?” Heinrich then asked, to which Jean-Pierre responded, “Again, I can’t speak to that report.  I refer you to the Department of Justice.”

Trying again to get an answer, Heinrich continued, “Generally speaking though, would monitoring Internet traffic be—” but was cut-off mid-sentence by Jean-Pierre who replied, “Jacqui, my answer is not going to change. I refer you to the Department of Justice.”

The Epoch Times has contacted The Department of Justice for comment.

Meanwhile, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton refused to answer questions regarding the alleged spying when asked by a Daily Mail reporter on Feb. 15.

Did you pay to spy on the Trump campaign,” Hillary was asked by the reporter in New York City. “When are you going to comment on the spying allegations, Hillary?”

Clinton declined to answer both questions and continued walking while waving at the reporter.

 

John Durham
Connecticut’s U.S. Attorney John Durham in 2018. (U.S. Department of Justice via AP)

Special counsel John Durham’s team alleged in a court filing (pdf) on Feb. 12 that a tech executive aligned with the Democratic Party spied on Trump’s residences and the White House when he was president.

Durham’s team alleged that Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who had worked on behalf of the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, had “assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign,” according to a section in the court filing, titled “Factual Background.”

Billing records he obtained reflect that Sussmann “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations.”

Sussmann is currently charged with making a false statement to the FBI when he gave the agency false documents that allegedly linked the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

He has pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to go to trial in May.

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing ​stated. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

The executive also “tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” the filing states, adding that the executive’s employer “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers” for Trump’s executive office.

The technology executive was not named in the filing.

Lawyers for Sussman, in response to the Durham filing, said on Feb. 14 that the motion included “prejudicial—and false—allegations that are irrelevant to his motion and to the charged offense, and are plainly intended to politicize this case, inflame media coverage, and taint the jury pool.”

They also argued that the information that Sussmann provided to federal government agencies related to the Executive Office of the President concerned the time period when Democrat Barack Obama was still president, not Trump.

Epoch Times Photo
Former President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., on Jan. 31, 2022. (The Epoch Times)

Trump also issued a statement regarding the unsealed filing, stating on Feb. 12 that it “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection.”

Trump has continuously denied that he had any business interests in Russia or colluded with Russian officials during the 2016 election and asserts he is the target of a witch hunt.

Jack Phillips contributed to this report.

Katabella Roberts is a reporter currently based in Turkey. She covers news and business for The Epoch Times, focusing primarily on the United States.

 

The New York Times and Washington Post are among the first establishment media outlets to report on the allegations against Hillary’s campaign associates, though the reporting came at least three days after the news first broke. CNN reported the court filings Tuesday morning.

MSNBC, NBC, ABC, and CBS news channels have ignored the recent revelations, according to Fox News.

The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions

act-of-1871

(POPEYE)   Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.

In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD — and that was very significant as you will read.

Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.

1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.

With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.

Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not!

Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.

What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed.

By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.

The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.

Home

Freedom Force Battalion TV Show

Which performers/celebs supported HRC during the 2016 election?
Katy Perry, Lady GAGA, Madonna, Beyonce, Jay Z, Amy Schumer, Miley Cyrus Julianne Moore, Elton John, Jamie Foxx, Olivia Wilde, Adele, Steven Spielberg, Drew Barrymore, Kerry Washington, Ellen Degeneres, Eva Longoria, Robert De Niro https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/celebrities-who-support-hillary-clinton-election-2016/
Bruce Springsteen, Sigourney Weaver, Meryl Streep, Demi Lovato, Lena Dunham, Ja Rule, Kim Kardashian, Magic Johnson, Miley Cyrus, Brittney Spears, Cee Lo Green, Kanye West, Drake, Lil’Wayne, Jamie Foxx, Justin Timberlake, Justin Beiber, Rosie O Donnel, Oprah Winfrey, Snoop Dogg, Numerous Sports figures, I.e. (Shaquille O’Neal, Kobe Bryant, Lebron James, Michael Jordan, The Williams Sisters, etc), Tyler Perry, R. Kelley, All the Kardasians, Taylor Swift, Amber Rose, Martin & Charlie Sheen, Barbara Walters, Kathy Griffin, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, Woody Allen, Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp, Seth Mc. Farlane, Matt Groening, George Takei, Harvey Weinstein, Tom Cruise, Kevin Spacey, Wendy Williams, William Baldwin, Dr. Dre, Eminem, Bon Jovi, George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Pharrell Williams, Billy Joel, Sister Sledge, Jessica Biel, Demi Lovato, Amy Schumer, Sarah Silverman, Ellen DeGeneres, Elizabeth Banks, Elton John, Lady Gaga, Bryan Cranston, Kat Dennings, Angela Bassett, Drew Barrymore, Shonda Rhimes, J.J. Abrams, Eva Longoria, Scarlett Johansson, Kerry Washington, Olivia Wilde, Reese Witherspoon, Julianne Moore, Lena Dunham, Robert De Niro, Matt Damon, Cher, Madonna, John Legend, Samuel Jackson…basically all the MSM icons.

Cbsnews (https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/celebrities-who-support-hillary-clinton-election-2016/)
Celebrities who support Hillary Clinton
No industry seems to be bluer than Hollywood, and these stars are lining up to give Clinton their praise … and cash

What We Think, We Become; Walmart Tunnels; 120 Children Children Hospitalized; Starlink and Quantum Rollout

The unthinkable is happening right before our very eyes or at least from our preferred electronic device. News and information is like the yin-yang philosophy,  that the universe is composed of competing and complementary forces of dark and light, sun and moon, male and female.  News and knowledge shapes our perception and how we see the world. Programming has been going on on since our birth and now information is being censored, revealing the elite/ globalist who want to control us. Humanity is waking up and realizing that propaganda is filling the airwaves. Most are trying to figure out what do or  how to move forward.

To move forward  we should realize the world is not as it seems; the physical and metaphysical worlds are inseparable, yet many ignore the wonders of the metaphysical world because of their perception, their programming.  The metaphysical world, the spiritual world, is all around us and can bring balance into our lives.  “What we think we become” is more accurate  today than anytime in world history.  Consider the the world we live in;  we created it based our our thoughts, emotions and actions.  See the source image

The Bible tells us not to conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.  For many,  the Veil is being lifted and are evolving spiritually.  From this experience, we begin  to seek to live in harmony with our Source,  the  power that creates the cosmos. From this relationship arises a profound feeling of happiness as well as spiritual, emotional and mental freedom.    Each person has to move forward in their own way and connect with our source starting with love,  thoughts, being grateful and appreciative for this experience. In time,  synchronicity’s will become part of your life, helping with your evolution as the old ways drop away and the new ways start a new beginning. Pay attention to your thoughts, emotions and actions. You are the only one that knows what works for you and realize there are many paths going the same destination.  The video with Nicholas Veniamin and Michelle Fielding provides insight on the spiritual aspect of what is happening in our world today.


Nicholas Veniamin and Michelle Fielding

Michelle Fielding Stunning New Prophecies!


This video about Walmart Tunnels  provides evidence the world is not as it  seems.  Perhaps they were Saving the Children From the D.U.M.B.’s

120 children hospitalized, province suspends Pfizer vaccine batch.

I was voting for Biden but this changed my mind

 

I was voting for Biden but this changed my mind to Trump

After researching all of the facts from this video it only made sense to vote for Donald Trump. Seriously put all petty issues aside. Put all the fake twisted “facts” you hear on social media and do the research yourself. The two things that mean the most to me are the protection of our constitutional rights and equality for all. Feel free to share this video.

%d bloggers like this: