According to new documents, it was revealed that Bill Gates, as well as his foundation, has given over $319 million to hundreds of Media Outlets, including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS, and The Atlantic Facts Matter (Jan. 12):
Sifting through over 30,000 grants in the company’s database, MintPress can reveal that the Gates Foundation has bankrolled hundreds of media outlets and ventures, to the tune of at least $319 million.
Vax propaganda on Sweden
Catholic Church Holds Funeral with Nazi Salutes & Swastika Flag Draped Coffin
St. Lucia in Rome has become the epicenter of a religious scandal. Footage from a funeral service showed the casket covered in a Nazi flag, while attendees did fascist salutes shouting, “Presente!”
The Catholic Church has tried to distance itself from the event publicized by the Italian online news portal Open. The Vicariate of Rome described the proceedings as ”ideological and violent exploitation … unacceptable for the church community of Rome,” adding that the Third Reich’s flag is “a horrendous symbol irreconcilable with Christianity.”
Local media identified the deceased as a 44-year-old woman, former member of the extreme right-wing, neo-fascist Forza Nuova group
Top U.S. health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, scrambled in early 2020 to respond to public reporting of a potential connection between COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
This response, which included a secret Feb. 1, 2020, teleconference, was loosely detailed in previously released and heavily redacted emails. Those emails strongly suggested that Fauci and a small group of top scientists sought to promote the natural origin theory, despite having evidence and internal expert opinions that pointed to the possibility of a leak from the Wuhan lab.
Unredacted versions of some of the emails made public by lawmakers on Jan. 11 further confirm this.
The newly unredacted emails, released by House Oversight Committee Republicans, confirm and illustrate a pattern of lies and coverup. From the emails, it appears the effort was spearheaded by Fauci himself but also involved his boss, recently retired National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Francis Collins, as well as Jeremy Farrar, the head of the British Wellcome Trust.
It was previously revealed that at least two scientists, both of whom had received funding from the NIH, had told Fauci during the teleconference that they were 60 to 80 percent sure that COVID had come out of a lab.
The most significant new revelations in the unredacted emails come from two of these scientists, Robert Garry and Mike Farzan, who both noted the difficulties presented by the presence of a furin cleavage site in the COVID-19 virus—a feature that would later be cited as the defining characteristic of the virus.
‘Bothered by the Furin Site’
Farzan, an immunologist who in 2005 discovered the receptor of the original severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus, sent his post-teleconference notes to Farrar, who then shared them with Collins, Fauci, and Lawrence Tabak—top officials at the NIH. In those notes, Farzan wrote that he was “bothered by the furin site” and had difficulty explaining it “as an event outside the lab.” Farzan noted that it was theoretically possible the virus’s furin cleavage site could have arisen in nature but that it was “highly unlikely.”
The furin cleavage site is the defining feature that gives COVID-19 the ability to easily infect humans and has long been puzzled over by scientists, since no such site has ever been observed in naturally occurring SARS-related coronaviruses.
Farzan, like scientist Kristian Andersen, who has received funding from Fauci’s NIAID, works at the Scripps laboratory. As was already known from previously released emails, Andersen had privately told Fauci on Jan. 31, 2020 that the virus looked engineered. Andersen would later spearhead Fauci’s efforts to promote a natural origin narrative.
Farzan told the senior members of Fauci’s teleconference group that “a likely explanation could be something as simple as passage SARS-live CoVs in tissue culture on human cell lines” for an “extended period of time,” which could lead to the accidental creation of “a virus that would be primed for rapid transmission between humans.” This mutated virus would likely have specific “adaptation to human ACE2 receptor via repeated passage.”
A recent study in the science journal Nature noted that the COVID-19 virus was uniquely adapted to infect humans, as it “exhibited the highest binding to human (h)ACE2 of all the species tested.”
In layman’s terms, Farzan concluded that the pandemic likely originated from a lab in which live coronaviruses were passed through human-like tissue over and over, accelerating virus mutations with the end result being that one of the mutated viruses may have leaked from the lab. Farzan placed the likelihood of a leak from a Wuhan lab at 60 to 70 percent likely.
The emails indicate that Farzan was cognizant that the Wuhan lab conducted these types of dangerous experiments in Level 2 labs, which have a very low biosecurity standard. This fact was later admitted by the Wuhan lab’s director, Shi Zhengli, in July 2020. Notably, since the start of the pandemic, Farzan has received grants totaling almost $20 million from Collins’s NIH and Fauci’s NIAID.
‘Can’t Figure Out How This Gets Accomplished in Nature’
Further revelations in the newly unredacted emails came from Garry, another scientist funded by Fauci’s NIAID, who told the senior members of the teleconference group in no uncertain terms that “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus” to COVID-19.
Garry cited the remarkable sequences that would have to occur naturally, telling the group that “I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature. Do the alignment of the spikes at the amino acid level – it’s stunning.” He noted that a lab-created virus would readily explain the data he was seeing, telling Fauci’s group that “Of course, in the lab, it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted.”
Along the same lines of what Farzan had said, Garry was telling Fauci’s group that it was extremely unlikely that the furin cleavage site could have evolved naturally, whereas creating it in a lab was easy.
The primary difference between Farzan’s and Garry’s view lies in whether the lab created the furin cleavage site through serial passage in human-like tissue or through direct insertion of the site. In either case, both scientists thought it was likely that the virus came out of the Wuhan lab rather than having originated in nature.
Scientist’s Private Views Conflicted With Public Statements
Garry’s privately stated view is even more remarkable because only a day earlier, on Feb. 1, 2020, Garry had helped to complete the first draft of the Proximal Origin paper that promoted the idea that the virus had originated in nature. That paper became the media’s and the public health establishment’s go-to evidence for a natural origin for the COVID virus.
It was published online on Feb. 16, 2020, and firmly excluded the possibility of a lab leak.
One of Garry’s co-authors for the Proximal Origin paper, Andrew Rambaut, also is cited in the newly redacted emails. In congruence with the other two scientists, Rambaut told Fauci’s teleconference group that he also was bothered by the unusual furin cleavage site. But unlike Garry or Farzan, he speculated that the virus might have arisen in another animal, a so-called intermediate host.
Two years later, no such host has been identified. In the case of the original SARS virus as well as the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) virus, the intermediate host was found within a few months. Rambaut also recognized immediately the peculiar fact that the furin cleavage site “insertion has resulted in an extremely fit virus in humans—we can also deduce that it is not optimal for transmission in bat species.”
Rambaut lamented the lack of data being shared by Wuhan scientists and concluded that only the Wuhan Institute of Virology knew what had happened.
Fauci’s Group Misleads National Academy of Sciences
The day after these three scientists shared their views with the senior members of the group, on Feb. 3, 2020, Fauci attended a meeting at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). That meeting had been urgently convened at the behest of White House Director of Science and Technology Kelvin Droegmeier, who wrote that he was seeking answers about the origins of COVID-19.
The meeting, which included a presentation by Fauci, was also attended by Peter Daszak–the person through whom Fauci had funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology–and Kristian Andersen. Fauci and his group promoted the natural origin theory to the Academy, despite having just been told on the teleconference and in subsequent emails that a lab leak provided the most likely explanation for the virus.
While they were pushing their natural origin narrative to NASEM, and by extension to the White House, Fauci and his group made no mention of their private discussions—which were taking place at the same time—that the virus most likely originated in a Wuhan lab.
NIH Hiding Behind Unjustifiable Redactions
The new emails fill some of the gaps left by previous redactions, but still only cover a small portion of the many emails that remain redacted. A close examination of the newly unredacted emails reveals that none of the usual justifications for redactions, such as private information about people or threats to sources and methods, apply. Instead, it appears that all of the redactions were made solely on the basis of shielding the NIH from scrutiny over its coverup of the virus’s origins.
These efforts at obfuscation tie in with the fact that we only found out about these new emails after a months-long battle between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the parent organization of Fauci’s NIH and NIAID, and House Republicans.
In order to obtain this information, House Republicans were forced to avail themselves of a rarely used law from 1928, the so-called Seven Member Rule. Under this law, an executive agency, such as HHS, is required to provide requested information when requested by seven members of the House Committee on Government Operations (now called the Committee on Oversight and Reform).
It isn’t known why Republicans haven’t used this law earlier or with greater frequency.
Eventually, HHS allowed the House Republicans’ congressional staffers to view the unredacted emails in person. The staffers then transcribed what they saw, which is how we came to know about these new revelations.
NIH Silences Dissenting Views
These new emails are crucial in that they confirm that by Feb. 2, 2020, Fauci’s teleconference group had identified evidence pointing to a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These scientists knew that the virus’s unique furin cleavage site was very likely the result of experiments conducted at the Wuhan lab. Notably, they also knew that these experiments were being conducted in minimum biosecurity Level 2 labs.
These facts presented a major problem for the heads of the NIH, who had funded the experiments.
As the new emails confirm, their response was to cover up the lab leak evidence and push a natural origin narrative.
Then-NIH Director Collins, who would later call for the public “takedown” of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, asked his group for a “swift convening of experts” in order to prevent the “voices of conspiracy” from doing “great potential harm to science and international harmony…” through public discussion of a lab leak theory.
Collins’s view was mirrored by another participant in Fauci’s teleconference, Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier, who told the group that “Further debate about such accusations would unnecessarily distract top researchers from their active duties and do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular.”
Jeff Carlson co-hosts the show Truth Over News on Epoch TV. He is a CFA-registered Charterholder and worked for 20 years as an analyst and portfolio manager in the high-yield bond market. He also runs the website TheMarketsWork.com and can be followed on Twitter @themarketswork.
Hans Mahncke co-hosts the show Truth Over News on Epoch TV. He holds LL.B., LL.M. and Ph.D. degrees in law. He is the author of numerous law books and his research has been published in a range of international journals. Hans can be followed on Twitter @hansmahncke
Geoengineering or chemtrails has been going on for a long time. All anyone has to do is go outside on most days and just look up. Contrails dissipate, Chemtrails or geoengineering spreads out and block the sunlight, called Sunshade geoengineering. All of us, including the deniers, breathe the chemicals that are sprayed which seem to be continuous. All of this is under the pretense of global warming. It is not reported by the media for a reason. They do not want public uproar so they simply send people out answering questions like this that these are just contrails and it is not happening. In the meantime people are sicker today than ever before.
Robert Lee, a concerned citizen and U.S. Marine veteran who owns and operates Rockingham Guns and Ammo wrote “Chemtrails: What are they spraying” in the Richmond County Daily Journal.
Dane Wigington has been sounding the alarm for years about Geoengineering, but has been labeled as a conspiracy theorist, a name used to label people to ensure others do not listen or pay attention. Dane said with each passing day the transformation of our world is accelerating, the human race is pushing our once thriving planet past the point of no return.
Harvard scientists launched one of the largest research programs into “solar geoengineering,” a controversial technique involving the injection of aerosols into the stratosphere with the goal of cooling the planet and reversing climate change. Dane Wigington admits many thousands will die from Harvard Solar Geoengineering Program 2018.
Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering and the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee wrote a regulation for geoengineering in 2010. Their definition Geoengineering is not, however, a monolithic subject. Geoengineering methods are “diverse and vary greatly in terms of their technological characteristics and possible consequences”. They can be—and were by those who submitted evidence to us— classified into two main groups: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) techniques; and Solar Radiation Management (SRM) techniques.
Geoengineering is happening and all you have to do is look up. Check it out for yourself. It does not happen everyday but most days you will see a plane with a long trail that does not dissipate. It actually spreads out blocking the sun, making us believe it is clouds. According to the Global Burden of Disease study in 2013 there are only about 4 percent of people worldwide had no health problems while a third, about 2.3 billion people, had more than five health problems. Infectious diseases are spreading around the world faster than ever, says the World Health Organization, and new diseases are emerging at the unprecedented rate of one a year.
Do your own research and realize the world is and was not as it seems.
More proof this has been happening for a long time at this link.
From the Law of One in 1981
8.7Questioner: I’m puzzled by these craft that we have undersea bases for. They are [inaudible]. Is this technology sufficient to overshadow all other armaments? Do we have just the ability to fly in these craft or are there any weapons like there are… Were they given to us [inaudible] or are they just craft for transport? What is the basic mechanism of their [inaudible]? It’s really hard to believe is what I’m saying.
Ra: I am Ra. The craft are perhaps misnamed in some instances. It would be more appropriate to consider them as weaponry. The energy used is that of the field of electromagnetic energy which polarizes the Earth sphere. The weaponry is of two basic kinds: that which is called by your peoples psychotronic and that which is called by your peoples particle beam. The amount of destruction which is contained in this technology is considerable and the weapons have been used in many cases to alter weather patterns and to enhance the vibratory change which engulfs your planet at this time.
The real truth of human origins have been suppressed.
Last night – on 12th December here in New Zealand, therefore 12:12 – I regressed someone very dear to me. For new blog readers, I am a qualified experienced past life regressionist. To our amazement, her Higher Self started channeling information about The Event which is believed to happen before 21st December. In other words, within DAYS.
Please use your discernment as you read these excerpts from the channeling. I believe the integrity of the channeling to be sound because I closely observed the person as she was channeling and I know it to be a genuine deep trance.
I have put a paragraph at the end in bold because the information is astounding. Please don’t miss reading it.
Channeling About The Event
‘People will be shaken to their core by it…It feels like an earthquake, not necessarily a big one but a GLOBAL one…It happens all over the world at the same time…I do feel it’s in December…It’s not about fatalities but it will be something that has never happened before…It’s enough to simultaneously affect every human…I feel like the shake AWAKENS more people. It stops people focusing on Covid – enough to question what on Earth is happening, and then that will awaken more people. I think this Event is orchestrated by off-planet beings…It’s part of the plan. This is the first domino because it’s something that no one can explain, so people start to question their reality. They will stop listening to the news because it’s (the Event) inexplicable. Light workers just need to be prepared and not be afraid. It is nothing for us to be afraid of but other people will be afraid. Light workers will know. It’s the only thing that can globally stop everything being about Covid…This is a start. It’s a distraction.
Everything needs to have a shakeup before it can be resettled…There will be crashes in the financial markets. Things have to be destroyed first. It will appear terrifying to some people but we can’t go on this way. There’s nothing that can stop the (world) leaders regarding Covid unless it’s something physically outside of their control.
Before the peace and prosperity comes in, first everything has to all come down, which takes time. Questioning the reality, the narrative, the control. And people will be angry that they’ve been separated for so long from other people. We’ve felt for so long that it’s only our country but because this event affects the WHOLE globe, people will become very angry that they can’t see people in other countries…And it makes them realize how we ARE our world and not just an insular country. So people will really want to see the borders open because their loved ones were affected too…Covid was a last ditch effort (by the dark forces) to get control…The biggest thing we can do (regarding the Event) is not fear, and hold the Light for everybody else.
I feel like it (the Event) will be a snapping inside people’s brains, like a cracker going off. Like the shake literally snaps something back into place – like coming out of a fog. I feel this shake happening in a matter of days. I’ve got the 21st, but it could be 21 as in 2021. It is such a shift in timeline that there’s no going back to before.
People will understand the truth at the level they need to learn it. Some people will have to start at the beginning, and understand the truth of the world and what’s been happening for millions of years – the control, the darkness. That’s why those people are scared because it’s like a remembrance that comes over everybody. Some people, like light workers, don’t need to remember much – but for others it’s overwhelming. And that’s why people could be yelling in the streets and other people are afraid in their homes – because suddenly the world is different and they are processing it. But it will be people like us who understand what’s going on that can calm others – they will listen to and follow us.
Everything falls away. Every part of society that has been constructed to destroy humans – their health, their spirituality, their connectiveness – will be shaken up. Things like fast food – people will just leave the industry. No one will work there anymore. It will slowly all fall away, like dominos, in all aspects.
Everyone has had their chance to get to this point on their own. The people who are left are GOING to be shaken, with no choice in the matter. But everyone will get there eventually. It’s an ego death for a lot of people. And money won’t matter anymore – the rich and the people with big houses will realize that nothing matters.
People will have to let go, let it ALL go – the ego around their jobs. And they will need to learn self-love – not to rely on it from other people. That will come – with remembering who they are, they will remember what is good for them, good for their health. And they won’t be able to go back. It’s almost like it will be physically impossible to eat and drink how it was before. Things like meat will become repulsive. Over time. I’m not saying this happens in one day. But everything falls away.
Something will happen before Christmas. Because of the shake – or whatever happens, if it’s a metaphor, whatever event happens before Christmas – the IDEA of Christmas will go. Suddenly it will be about PEOPLE. Because of what everyone had been through before Christmas, people will come together but the point of the day is that we are just grateful to have each other. Christmas as we KNOW it, or as you PLAN it, won’t be the same. People will reach out to long-lost people. It’s like a day of reconnection and celebrating being a human.
The vaccine and 5G – I think there’s something in it (the vaccine) that is activated. It gets activated but there’s an override from the Light and the activation (planned by the dark forces) goes wrong. I feel instead of whatever the activation was meant to do, it’s more of an upgrade. So the people who GOT the vaccine NEEDED it TO upgrade. They are the ones who needed to be awakened. And when they (dark forces) flip the switch, it doesn’t go the way they intended. It actually UPGRADES people’s DNA. People can ‘see’ again. So it backfires (for the dark forces). The people that took it (the jab) NEEDED it. The dark forces plan was hijacked. Because of the high vibration of other people on the planet – and them (light workers) doing the work right now – it can transmute it all. It can change it. The people who were so scared and turned on the unvaccinated, they are the ones that needed this upgrade. The ones who DIDN’T take it (jab), didn’t need it. Or they knew there’s nothing to fear.
I’m getting the sense that when the earthquake – or whatever it is – hits, people suddenly think about the people that matter to them. That will happen around the world. It’s like a near-death experience – your life flashing before your eyes and you realise what’s important. The message gets through in that moment. Everything else falls away. The jobs, the money – NOTHING matters after this thing happens. It’s like the feeling of a close call for everybody on the planet.’
Thank you for reading this post. You are welcome to share it as long as you re-post it in its entirety, including the link to my blog site.
Ghislaine Maxwell and the Terramar Project child trafficking links.
Victim of vaccine damage pleads with regulators at Senator hearing.
Congressman Jim Jordan Ask Immunity Questions to Doctor. Natural Immunity is 27 times better than any Jab!!!
Operation Mockingbird is an large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate the media for propaganda purposes. Apparently the program is ongoing and part of Mainstream and Social Media today
The risk of developing a form of heart inflammation is higher for people younger than 40 after receiving Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine than it is from contracting COVID-19, according to a new study.
Researchers found 15 excess cases per 1 million people who received a second dose of the vaccine compared to 10 extra cases of myocarditis following a positive COVID-19 test. Moderna’s vaccine is typically taken in a two-dose regimen.
The risk of myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation, was much higher following the second dose of the Moderna vaccine, but there were still eight excess cases per 1 million people following the first dose as well.
“Time to abandon the belief that COVID-19 myocarditis risk is always higher than mRNA vaccine myocarditis risk. For some individuals, myocarditis risks of the vaccine(s) are higher than those of the disease,” Euzebiusz Jamrozik, an infectious disease expert who works at the University of Oxford, wrote on Twitter.
The elevated risk stood out against what researchers found for the Pfizer-BioNTech and AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccines. People were found to be more at risk of contracting myocarditis from COVID-19 than from either of those vaccines, regardless of age.
“This population-based study quantifies for the first time the risk of several rare cardiac adverse events associated with three COVID-19 vaccines as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in adults was associated with a small increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantial increase in the risk of hospitalization or death from myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmia,” the researchers wrote.
The study was published in Nature and was carried out by professors from multiple colleges, including the University of Oxford, which helped develop the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
Researchers utilized data from the English National Immunization database, which includes information on all people vaccinated in England. The database featured information on 38.6 million people through Aug. 24.
Limitations on the study included not breaking down the data further—previous studies indicate that teenagers are at much higher risk of myocarditis from vaccines than older people—and Moderna’s vaccine not being available in the UK until April.
Representatives for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Myocarditis and another form of heart inflammation, pericarditis, have been identified as serious side effects following vaccination with the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, which are both built on messenger RNA technology. A U.S. study analyzing reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System found that teenage boys were more likely to suffer heart inflammation from the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines than they were from COVID-19 hospitalization.
Some countries, including Finland, paused their administration of Moderna’s vaccine to youth because of concerns about the side effect.
“The preliminary data showed that among those under 30, the myocarditis and pericarditis incidence was higher than expected,” Dr. Hanna Nohynek, chief physician of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare’s Unit Infectious Diseases Control and Vaccines, told The Epoch Times in November.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration pushed back a decision in late October on whether to authorize the Moderna vaccine for children aged 17 and younger. Moderna stated that this was done so that drug regulators could more closely analyze the risk-benefit calculus.
Moderna stated in a November call that its vaccine, which is administered at a higher amount than Pfizer’s, offers better protection, but also brings more myocarditis risk.
A Canadian pre-print study published last week found that the incidence of heart inflammation was 5.1 times higher for males between 18 and 24 who got a second dose of Moderna’s vaccine versus those in the same population who received a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.
The risk of myocarditis following vaccination was much lower in youth who received the second dose at a longer interval, researchers found. Some countries have stretched the time between the first and second vaccine dose as a result of similar studies.
Zachary Stieber covers U.S. news and stories relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. He is based in Maryland.
GOD IS WITHIN YOU
Jean Claude Koven
15 October 2009
When people ask me if I am religious, I tell them I love God far too much to be religious. “Oh, then you must believe in God?” they inevitably God is within you ask. “Of course not,” I reply with a smile, “does a fish believe in water?” For me, God is all there is. What’s to believe?
Although all the world’s major religions agree that God (however they define the term) is omnipresent, it seems that very few of their followers including their clerical hierarchy actually understand what omnipresence really means. And therein lies the source of the world’s ills.
For a start, we take our relationship with God far too seriously. We bring so much solemnity to the way we view God awe, veneration, obedience, and the like that we end up creating distance between us and the object of our worship.
Expressions such as “God is my judge,” “God forbid,” and “God bless you” creep into our language, and consequently our thoughts. People are actually proud to call themselves God-fearing folk. For too many of us, God is somewhere out there, watching and judging us as we struggle through our imperfect lives.
And consider this: Some religions consider the name of God so holy that it is never pronounced. Instead they create a litany of substitute terms so they can talk about God without having to commit the blasphemy of actually using his name.
When practitioners of these religions write about their deity, they are instructed to omit the vowel: G-d. Other religions take the opposite tack. They encourage their devotees to chant or meditate on the name of God for hours at a time.
To their way of believing, focusing on God leads to a state of bliss that opens the door to transcendence and enlightenment. But if God is truly all that is, what can possibly make one of his names more powerful than any other?
For that matter, what is the purpose of naming him (or her or it) in the first place?
Naming anything creates a subject/object relationship between you and the thing named, and that in and of itself means a separation. Every name of God, no matter how holy, drives a wedge between the creator and the created which includes you and me.
This separation is the primal breeding ground for fear, for we then see ourselves as tiny beings, abandoned (or evicted from Paradise) and living on the fringe of an incomprehensibly huge cosmos.
But what if the phrase “God is all that is” were literally true? This is what R Buckminster Fuller must have understood when he said, “God, to me, it seems, is a verb not a noun.” His words, when I first read them, lodged in my mind.
But I didn’t get their full import until many years later, during my first visit to Findhorn, the renowned spiritual community in northeast Scotland.
It was there, sitting in a circle with my fellow newbies, that the penny dropped. One young man in our group, Peter, suddenly exclaimed, “Oh, wow, I finally see it. It is not that God is in all things; it’s that God is all things.”
His exclamation triggered two remarkable realisations for me. First, the obvious is obvious only to those who are sufficiently present to see it. The delivery of Peter’s life-changing epiphany had virtually no effect on the rest of the group.
Our facilitator was so consumed by his orientation agenda that he missed the moment completely. Thanking Peter for his contribution, he simply asked the group if anyone else had anything to share.
Second, what Peter said is literally true. In an instant, Bucky’s words became crystal clear. God is indeed a verb. He is not the creator. He is the ongoing unfoldment of creation itself. There is nothing that is not a part of this unfolding. Thus there can be nothing separate from God. God is infinite and infinity is One.
From that moment, everything in my life began to change. It wasn’t immediate; it was rather like a giant oil tanker slowly making a U-turn. As if I were facing in a new direction, I looked at the world in a new way “How,” I asked myself, “do we dupe ourselves so completely? How come so few people see what Bucky and Peter see? How could I myself have been so blind?”
When we perceive God as a noun, we envision him as the creator, the architect of, and therefore separate from, his creation.
Identifying ourselves as part of that creation, we see ourselves not only separate from our source but separate from each other and all other manifest things as well. This is the fatally flawed axiom underlying virtually all of the world’s faiths.
Once I viewed God as a verb instead of a noun, my perception of life shifted. Everything around and its manifestation became God. There was only God. When someone spoke to me, it was with God’s voice; when I listened, it was with God’s heart. I invite you to try it.
The small shift from noun to verb may well be the antidote to the forbidden fruit that banished us from Eden. As you begin to view God not as the creator but as the constantly changing dance of creation itself, you’ll discover him in everything you see including yourself.
As the great awakening unfolds, more and more people are waking up, realizing the world is and was not as it seems; Our physical metaphysical worlds are inseparable. Consider the plandemic a wake up call for humanity. Censorship by major news networks, Facebook, Google twitter and other major social media outlets, all hiding the truth. When someone speaks against out them, they are a conspiracy theorist. The word “conspiracy theorist” is a label attached to anyone that is does not agree with the mainstream narrative. Since the 1960s the label has become a tool used by the elites that has been very effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Other words, hiding the truth.
It is up to each of us to seek the truth, what is really happening around the world. This documentary will provide insight to the end of our world as we know it. It has been censored by YouTube and others so there must be information they do not want you to see. Good versus evil at the highest levels of our world.
Catherine Austin Fitts speaks with German Attorney about financial sovereignty, government corruption and her battle with deep state.
“He who has eyes to see, let him see, and he who has ears to hear, let him hear.”
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German lawyer. He is among the most influential and prominent lawyers in Germany. He was born and raised in Bremen, Germany. Dr. Fuellmich is serving as one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee since July 10, 2020 and exposes the cabal.
Gospel of Thomas (3) Jesus said, “If those who lead you (plur.) say to you, ‘See, the kingdom is in heaven,’ then the birds of heaven will precede you. If they say to you, ‘It is in the sea,’ then the fish will precede you. But the kingdom is inside of you. And it is outside of you. “When you become acquainted with yourselves, then you will be recognized. And you will understand that it is you who are children of the living father. But if you do not become acquainted with yourselves, then you are in poverty, and it is you who are the poverty.”