CDC numbers reveal hospitals counted over 130K deaths from pneumonia, influenza heart attacks as Covid19

CDC numbers reveal hospitals counted over 130K deaths from pneumonia influenza, heart attacks as covid 19

From Epoch Times: Did you know that our documentary on the irregularities of the 2020 election. Who’s Stealing America? was produced in only 40 days? We  started investigating after allegations of voter fraud and irregularities began to emerge on the night of the election. And what we found alarmed us. We knew right away that the results of our research had implications for the outcome of the 2020 election.

Excellent video that Everyone should watch!!!!! Who’s Stealing America? 

One America News Network (oann.com)

I cannot keep doing this 

Ivermectin Highlighted for Early Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19

December 14, 2020 Updated: December 14, 2020

Doctors at a recent Senate hearing stressed the importance of more research and guidance on the early or preventative treatment of COVID-19 in the fight against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, even after the roll-out of vaccines.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, led by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), held a second hearing on early outpatient treatment for COVID-19 on Dec. 8 to “discuss early treatment options that attack the disease in the first stage by limiting viral replication” in hopes of preventing disease progression, hospitalizations, and death.

Dr. Armand Balboni, CEO of Appili Therapeutics Inc., said there is a need for options to combat the virus at various stages, particularly “at the moment of exposure or confirmed infection.”

Antiviral drugs that target the CCP virus, particularly ones that are safe and can be “easily manufactured and distributed globally,” can fill the role in treating COVID-19, the disease cause by the virus, outside of a hospital setting.

“These drugs are not intended to replace COVID-19 vaccines and other therapeutics for severely ill patients, but to cover aspects of disease management beyond the scope of vaccines and therapeutics for severe cases,” Balboni said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guideline for people who test positive for the CCP virus is to quarantine and self-monitor symptoms. Treatments are provided when an individual requires hospitalization.

Epoch Times Photo
(L-R) Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) accompanied by the committee’s ranking member Sen. Tom Carper, (D-Del.) at Capitol Hill in Washington on Sept. 27, 2016. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

Data shows that certain repurposed drugs can treat the early phase of COVID-19, so the scientific community and federal health agencies should be encouraging, instead of “discouraging, and in some cases prohibiting, the research and use of drugs that have been safely used for decades,” Johnson said.

“In fact, there has been a concerted effort to block doctors who actually treat COVID patients from compassionately using their ‘off label’ prescription rights for early treatment protocols,” he added.

An off-label prescription allows doctors to prescribe a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a condition other than its intended use “when they judge that it is medically appropriate for their patient.” It is a common and legal practice in the medical community.

Scientists are finding that ivermectin—an oral drug that treats scabies, parasitic infections, river blindness, and rosacea in humans—is also effective in treating COVID-19. The drug is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines.

Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter, a pulmonologist in Florida, was one of the first doctors to use ivermectin to treat patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms early on in the pandemic. This “laid the foundation” for him and his co-authors to conduct a retrospective observational study that found a much lower mortality rate in hospitalized patients given ivermectin than those in a standard care group.

Rajter says that ivermectin was soon adopted as part of the hospital’s treatment protocol for COVID-19, and more than seven months later, “The success rate of the Ivermectin based protocol is now far superior to what it was in its early days.”

He says more randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the “preliminary findings” and address any safety concerns on the use of ivermectin. Yet, while his team “has multiple study protocols in place, ready to be implemented in short order,” funding and support for such a study has been difficult.

Dr. Kory Pierre, a pulmonologist at Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, says he and members of his organization at Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance have spent “almost nine months tirelessly reviewing the scientific literature to gain insight into this virus and the disease process and to develop effective treatment protocols” while treating COVID-19 patients.

They have developed a protocol called I-MASK+ to prevent and treat early symptoms of COVID-19 after extensive research on ivermectin.

“In the last 3-4 months, emerging publications provide conclusive data on the profound efficacy of the anti-parasite, anti-viral drug, anti-inflammatory agent called ivermectin in all stages of the disease,” Pierre said.

“Ivermectin is highly safe, widely available, and low cost,” he added. “We now have data from over 20 well-designed clinical studies, 10 of them randomized, controlled trials, with every study consistently reporting large magnitude and statistically significant benefits in decreasing transmission rates, shortening recovery times, decreasing hospitalizations, or large reductions in deaths.”

In his closing statement, Pierre pleaded for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to look at his organization’s review of the available data on ivermectin that has not been peer-reviewed.

“All I ask is for the NIH to review our data that we’ve compiled of all of the emerging data … We have immense amounts of data to show that it must be implemented and implemented now.”

The NIH does not recommend the use of ivermectin except in a clinical trial.

The FDA says ivermectin “should be avoided” as its benefits and safety haven’t been established and that “testing is needed to determine whether ivermectin might be appropriate” for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Information about ivermectin hasn’t been updated since Aug. 27 on the NIH’s website, or since May 1 on the FDA’s website, although more clinical data have been published about the drug in preventing and treating COVID-19.

A lab technicians holds the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) treatment drug "Remdesivir"-1
A lab technician holds the COVID-19 treatment drug “Remdesivir” at Eva Pharma Facility in Cairo, Egypt, on June 25, 2020. (Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Reuters)

Remdesivir is the only FDA-approved drug for treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients who require oxygen supplementation. Yet studies show no effect on mortality and only a small benefit on time of recovery (hospital discharge by about one to three days.)

The most recent study involving 1,033 hospitalized patients, found that a combination of remdesivir and baricitinib, an anti-inflammatory drug, allowed patients to recover a median of one day quicker than those in the control group consisting of remdesivir and a placebo.

Other COVID-19 treatments such as monoclonal antibodies and dexamethasone have been granted emergency use authorization by the FDA.

The monoclonal antibodies are prescribed for mild to moderate outpatient COVID-19 although there is “insufficient data from clinical trials to recommend either for or against the use,” while dexamethasone, the only repurposed drug, has been effective in treating severe COVID-19 symptoms.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, PhD, says the lack of funding for randomized trials on existing drugs for early intervention of COVID-19 is leaving some scientists and physicians to not prescribe certain drugs or other therapies despite their effectiveness.

Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University, says this is where the NIH can play a role.

“In principle, the NIH exists to solve this market failure,” Bhattacharya says. “It could and should use its resources to help fund randomized evaluations of these drugs for off-label purposes.”

The NIH did not respond to a request for comment.

Attacked by Media

Johnson said that prior to the hearing, he and the physicians were attacked by media calling it “dangerous, and instead of waiting until after the hearing to trash this information and our witnesses, The New York Times and other publications have already run pre-emptive attacks, implying this hearing is anti-vaccine.”

Balboni, a life-long Democrat and a subscriber to The NY Times, says he almost didn’t participate in the hearing. “I have to say, I was quite dismayed this morning and almost didn’t participate when I saw the news that I was participating as a fringe member of an anti-vaccine group,” Balboni says. “That couldn’t be further from the truth.”

Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich) the only Democrat present at the hearing, in his opening statement before walking out, accused the committee of being “used as a platform to attack science and promote discredited treatments.”

“Sadly, it appears that today’s hearing will follow the same path, playing politics with public health, and will not give us the information we need to tackle this crisis,” Peters said. “The panelists have been selected for their political, not their medical, views.”

The other Democrat members refused to attend the hearing. Five Republicans also didn’t attend.

Johnson said he doesn’t understand the “concerted effort to silence the voices” of health professionals promoting early treatments for COVID-19.

 

 

Unmasking the Ritual of the Mask

When persons being held as slaves were accused by their masters of insubordination, or of eating more than their allotment of food, they might expect to be fitted with an iron muzzle. In his autobiography, Olaudah Equiano described his first encounter with such a device in the mid-1700s. . .

“I had seen a black woman slave as I came through the house, who was cooking the dinner, and the poor creature was cruelly loaded with various kinds of iron machines; she had one particularly on her head, which locked her mouth so fast that she could scarcely speak, and could not eat or drink. I [was] much astonished and shocked at this contrivance, which I afterwards learned was called the iron muzzle.”

Slave with Iron Muzzle is an illustration from the 1839 publication, Souvenirs d’un aveugle, by Jacques Etienne Victor Arago  (link).

There is much controversy today regarding the mandate of mandatory mask, perhaps some would say our iron muzzle.   The recommendations to wear mask or not wearing mask, come from  CDC, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the State Health Departments who are referred to as the  Global scientists aligning with the World Health Organization. Depends on who you ask and when you will get different answers.  If the masking would actually stop the spread of a deadly virus, there would be no hesitation from most people. But this so called pandemic seems to be very questionable. Ninety-four percent of Americans who died from COVID-19 had other “types of health conditions and contributing causes” in addition to the virus, according to a new CDC report. That leaves the  6 percent of those deaths directly related only to covid19 while the rest had at least two or more underlying pre-existing  conditions, including diabetics, obesity. heart disease, lung disease, kidney disease, dementia and hypertension.

In fact, people who are obese, who also have the coronavirus, are more than twice as likely to end up in the hospital and nearly 50 percent more likely to die.

So why the mask? Is it to create division?  Some believe they are keeping themselves and others safe while others feel it hinders good health,  our immune system; and even believe it falls in line with slavery and  satanic rituals.

The New England Journal of Medicine said in an article published in April 2020 stated,  ” We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”

“We are not defenseless against COVID-19,” said CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield. “Cloth face coverings are one of the most powerful weapons we have to slow and stop the spread of the virus – particularly when used universally within a community setting. All Americans have a responsibility to protect themselves, their families, and their communities.”

It appears the medical community that has been silenced by Mainstream Media. Especially those who do not  believe the masks are beneficial, but yet communities around the county are making mask mandatory in order to work or go in to a business or even leave your home.  In Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy, Dr. Russell Blaylock says that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. If you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.

This is the first time in modern human history, an entire populace now faced each other, masked-up and social distancing. This was the first step toward chaos on the American street. Some didn’t realize the unintended consequences; some did and exploited this opportunity for the next step in manipulating society. The mandate of wearing masks or face coverings is  becoming more common in cities than suburbs.

The mask may represent the persona, the image you present to the world. Perhaps it means do not speak just do as you are told. Perhaps this entire pandemic is allowing you to take a fresh look at that image and also to look behind it, to discover your true self. It may have served you and supported your ego in the past, but possibly you are now beginning, or being urged, to see yourself in a new way.

For ceremonies  where masks are worn, they are viewed by both spectators and participants as consecrated objects imbued with supernatural power. Lets examine the four distinct, but interrelated, occult rituals that make up this massive global occult ritual initiation ceremony today: Ritual Mask-Wearing, Ritual Hand-Washing, Ritual “Social Distancing” and Ritual Lockdowns. Among other things, the wearing of the mask over one’s mouth is a token of submission, a gesture of your willingness to be subject to others who are not your usual Sovereign.

But there’s more.  According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, mask-wearing is:  “A form of disguise or concealment usually worn over or in front of the face to hide the identity of a person and by its own features to establish another being.”

In other words, the wearing of a mask may represent an occult transformation, a human alchemy, if you will , from one role to another.  From one manner of being, to another.  In this case, from individual sovereign under God to collective subject under the children of the devil,  a positive to negative transformation. The masking ritual is specifically designed to reverse the order of hierarchy  of Infinite Intelligence.  In the hierarchy of God, you are a sovereign representative of the divine.  Psychologically, as a spectator, you  are linked to the past through the spirit power of the mask.  So ask yourself , does your mask  represent malignant, evil, negative or potentially harmful spirits? Much to consider.

As the debate in schools regarding the mask requirement for children continues, it seems humanity has literally lost its moral compass by requiring mask for  the children. We all have our God Given immune systems to fight any type of disease and infection and we can develop herd immunity .  We simply have to nurture our mind, body and spirit by the foods we eat, the movement of our bodies, and by our thoughts, emotions and actions. God is closer than your heartbeat, all you have to do is listen.